|
State
Issues
Energy
Support policies that include coordinating grid management with
other Western States.
Support market reform with policies that enable and encourage
investments in new generation by utility and non-utility
participants in order to assure adequate supply and capacity.
SB 1368
Electricity: Emission of Greenhouse Gases (Perata) (April 2006)
The Chamber
opposes SB 1368 because it prohibits public or private utilities
from building or contracting baseload generation unless it meets
an emissions standard set by the California Energy Commission.
This bill would establish a greenhouse gas emission performance
standard, limiting the available power sources to meet
California’s energy demands while substantially increasing the
price of electricity to consumers and businesses.
Support measures that initiate the full cost recovery for
utilities to ensure utilities are fiscally sound and not at risk
of bankruptcy.
SB 1252 Air
pollution, penalties: particulate matter (Florez) (April 2006)
The Chamber
opposes SB 1252 because it Imposes a fine of up to $25,000 per
violation for a discharge of PM10 or PM 2.5 and increases the
fine to $50,000 in 2010, driving businesses out of California
for these imposed fines. In addition, increasing the penalty
when the cause-effect relationship between particulate matter
2.5 and health effects is still unclear is far too premature and
unfair to those businesses working towards attainment.
Support measures that invest in new transmission and
transmission upgrades.
Support policies that are dedicated to both load reduction and
the use of renewable energy.
Support measures that lower the price of energy paid by
commercial and industrial customers.
Oil
Severance Tax (March 2006)
The Chamber
opposes the Oil Severance Tax because it would establishes a
program intended to reduce oil and gasoline use, with research
and production incentives for alternative energy, alternative
fuel vehicles, energy efficient technologies, and for education
and training. The funding will be provided by a tax of 1.5% to
6%, depending on oil price per barrel, on producers of oil
extracted in California.
AB 2218 Sales and Use Taxes: Manufacturing Equipment
(Torrico) (April 2006)
The Chamber
supports AB 2218 because it would declare the intent of the
Legislature to exempt from those taxes for the gross receipts
from the sale or use of manufacturing equipment.
AB 1478 Toxic Chemicals: Release Form (June 2006)
The Chamber
opposes AB 1478 because it requires particular businesses to
report, starting on a specific date, on the annual use and
disposal of toxic chemicals.
Contact Kerri Ginis,
the Chamber's Government Affairs Manager for more
information at
(559)
495-4818
or
kginis@fresnochamber.com
|