May 24, 2006
Fresno Chamber Opposes Living Wage Proposals
The Greater Fresno Area Chamber of Commerce opposes the
consideration of a living wage ordinance in the city of Fresno
based on the fact the Chamber opposes mandated wages by the
government, and the estimated impact it will have on the greater
business community.
The Fresno Chamber
believes:
- The 'living wage'
requirement alone would result in substantial increases in
employer costs. Not only would direct payroll costs be
increased, but workers’ compensation, unemployment insurance,
pensions and a multitude of other costs also would go up
substantially.
- Imposing a living
wage has the potential to severely limit competition and drive
up California’s procurement costs.
- A living wage
ordinance would affect both large and small businesses.
- California
employers already face the most stringent and punitive labor
laws in the country.
Background
Since 1994, roughly
120 entities—including municipalities, other government
agencies, and some school districts and colleges—have adopted
“living wage” ordinances. These ordinances, a direct outgrowth
of the living wage movement that has spread throughout the
country, set a minimum wage higher than the national or
statewide figures so that low-wage workers and their families
can meet their basic needs.
The living wage movement was set forth to recognize the
inadequacy of the current national and statewide minimum wage
levels as a basis for low-wage workers to meet the basic needs
of their families through their work efforts.
A living wage ordinance is being proposed by the Community
Alliance for a Fair Economy that would require anyone
contracting with the city for $50,000 or more to pay employees
at least $10 per hour and provide health insurance coverage or
$11.50 an hour without benefits.
A living wage ordinance requires employers to pay wages that are
above federal or state minimum wage levels. Only a specific set
of workers are covered by living wage ordinances, usually those
employed by businesses that have a contract with a city or
county government or those who receive economic development
subsidies from the locality. The rationale behind the ordinances
is that city and county governments should not contract with or
subsidize employers who pay poverty-level wages.
The living wage
level is usually the wage a full-time worker would need to earn
to support a family above federal poverty line, ranging from
100% to 130% of the poverty measurement. The wage rates
specified by living wage ordinances range from a low of $6.25 in
Milwaukee to a high of $12 in Santa Cruz.
In addition to
setting wage levels, many ordinances also have provisions
regarding benefits (such as health insurance and paid vacation),
labor relations, and hiring practices.
Contact Kerri Ginis,
the Chamber's Government Affairs Manager for more
information at
(559)
495-4818
or
kginis@fresnochamber.com