November 28, 2006
2006 Vote Record: Fresno Chamber Holds State Legislators
Accountable to Infrastructure Bonds on November Ballot
This past year marks a significant time for state of California.
As we prepare for the influx of population over the next twenty
years we must now begin a plan to fix the current being of our
state and continue to build a state that can sustain our future
growth. Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger’s Infrastructure Bond
Package has set out to do just that. In March of 2006 the
Governor introduced a bond package worth $37 billion. The bonds
would cover both K-12 and higher education systems,
transportation and infrastructure, housing, and flood
protection.
From the beginning the Chamber weighed in on these issues
because the Chamber understands that if we want to continue to
provide a healthy business climate in California, we must
provide for our communities. This voting record focuses on how
our local legislators voted for the infrastructure bond package.
|
Fresno Legislator |
Total Votes that
Aligned with the Fresno Chamber's
Position |
Total Votes
Against the Fresno Chamber's Position |
Total No Votes |
|

Senator
Dean Florez |
4 |
1 |
0 |
|

Senator
Chuck Poochigian |
4 |
1 |
0 |
|

Assemblymember Juan Arambula |
0 |
0 |
5 |
|

Assemblymember Dave Cogdill |
2 |
3 |
0 |
|

Assemblymember Nicole Parra |
4 |
1 |
0 |
|

Assemblymember Michael Villines |
1 |
4 |
0 |
What the "No Vote" May Actually Mean
There are times when a legislator is unwilling to vote on a
potential law. In this case, a legislator may abstain from
voting, which will hinder the bill from actually passing. Their
abstention is shown as a "no vote" and does not count for or against
them.
2006
Infrastructure Bonds Vote Record In Depth
Proposition 1A
-
Approved By Voters
Transportation Funding Protection
Fresno Chamber Position: Support
Florez: Support
Poochigian:
Support
Arambula: No Vote
Cogdill: Oppose
Parra: Support
Villines: Oppose
The transportation
funding protection would amend the State Constitution to further
limit the conditions under which the Proposition 42 transfer of
gasoline sales tax revenues for transportation uses can be
suspended. Specifically the measure requires Proposition 42
suspensions to be treated as loans to the General Fund that must
be repaid in full, including interest, within three years of
suspension.
Proposition 1B
-
Approved By Voters
Highway Safety, Traffic Control, Air Quality, Port Bond Act of
2006
Fresno Chamber Position: Support
Florez: Support
Poochigian:
Support
Arambula: No Vote
Cogdill: Oppose
Parra: Support
Villines: Oppose
California needs
better infrastructure, and proposition 1B will be beneficial for
the entire state. If approved by voters in November Proposition
1B will enact a $19.9 billion general obligation bond to fund
repairs, reduce congestion, improve bridge safety, expand public
transit, and improve port security statewide. The bond proposal
also authorizes public/private transportation partnerships,
application of the Design-Build method for these projects, and
legislation to streamline the environmental review process.
Proposition 1C
-
Approved By Voters
Housing and Emergency Shelter Trust Fund Act of 2006
Fresno Chamber Position: Oppose
Florez: Support
Poochigian: Oppose
Arambula:
No Vote
Cogdill: Oppose
Parra: Support
Villines: Oppose
This bill enacts the
Emergency Housing, Community Planning and Farmland Preservation
Bond Act of 2006 which will authorize the issuance of a $2.85
billion general obligation (G.O.) bond for state housing
programs. If voters approve this package, local cities and
county governments and local developers can apply for funds to
build low and moderate income affordable housing. The
application process does not guarantee money to any certain
area. The bond would give $135 million for farmworker housing,
without verifying their resident status. It would fund the
development of ownership or rental homes for agricultural
workers through grants to local governments and non-profit
organizations.
Proposition 1D
-
Approved By Voters
Kindergarten-University Public Education Facilities Bond Act of
2006
Fresno Chamber Position: Support
Florez: Support
Poochigian:
Oppose
Arambula:
No Vote
Cogdill: Oppose
Parra: Support
Villines: Oppose
Proposition 1D will
authorize a statewide general obligation (G.O.) education in the
amount of $10.416 billion. The education bond proposal
authorizes the placement of a 10.4 billion general obligation
bond to fund K-12 and Higher Education. Of this, $1.9 billion is
allocated for K-12 new construction and $3.3 billion is
allocated for K-12 modernization projects. The bond also
provides $3.087 billion to public colleges and universities.
Education is extremely important to tomorrow’s workforce. Prop
1D provides exceptional monies that will strengthen our state
center community college district, including, 19,247,000 for the
Willow/International development and secure funds for the north
and east wings of the old administration building at Fresno City
College, and the new southeast site child development centers at
Fresno City College and Reedley College.
Proposition 1E
-
Approved By Voters
Disaster Preparedness and Flood Prevention Act of 2006
Fresno Chamber Position: Support
Florez: Support
Poochigian:
Support
Arambula:
No Vote
Cogdill: Support
Parra: Support
Villines: Oppose
Enacts Disaster
Preparedness and Flood Prevention Bond Act of 2006, which would
authorize, subject to voter approval at the November 7, 2006
election, $4.090 billion worth of general obligation (G.O.)
bonds, from which sale proceeds would be allocated to
infrastructure projects for flood protection and levee repair
and improvement.
Assuming the $4.090 billion in bonds would be sold at an average
interest rate of 5% and then be paid off over 30 years, debt
service costs for principal and interest would total about $8
billion, or an average of about $270 million annually.
Contact Megan
Jacobsen,
the Chamber's Government Affairs and Communications Manager for more
information at
(559)
495-4818
or
mjacobsen@fresnochamber.com